The corrected evidence in Gilbert, King, Pettigrew, and Wilson's comment is described as consistent with psychological science reproducibility being statistically indistinguishable from 100%, while being insufficient to reliably estimate whether replicability actually is 100%.
Sources
- Comment on 'Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science' (gking.harvard.edu)
- http://deevybee.blogspot.com/2018/05/sowing-seeds-of-doubt-how-gilbert-et.html (deevybee.blogspot.com)
- https://retractionwatch.com/2016/03/07/lets-not-mischaracterize-replication-studies-authors/ (retractionwatch.com)
More in Science
- The 2007 PrISMA study surveyed 3,418 children aged 10-14 living in urban areas of Italy.
- According to the ninth AIFA report, the Comirnaty vaccine accounted for 68% of adverse event reports and 71.2% of doses administered in the campaign so far.
- Research indicates that inadequate sleep impairs the consolidation of procedural memories.
- The 2015–2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommend limiting daily sodium intake to less than 2,300 milligrams.
- Scientists discovered the giant bacterium Thiomargarita magnifica in the brackish waters of a red mangrove swamp in Guadeloupe, in the Lesser Antilles.
- The CDC recommends at least 150 minutes per week of brisk walking or similar physical activity—about 30 minutes a day, five days a week—for diabetes prevention.